Home Translator/Traductor

 
FEASTS AND SOLEMNITIES
 

Trinity Sunday

Year C

What follows is cast as a homily for June 6, 2004 , Trinity Sunday and its scriptures for Year C. As we make the move from Easter season back to Ordinary Time, we encounter the Sundays named for the Trinity and for the Body and Blood of Christ. This year’s scriptures for Trinity Sunday bring a first reading from a genre we don’t hear enough, the wisdom poetry (Proverbs 8:22–31). The direction of the effort below at mystagogical preaching takes this return to Ordinary Time and the June 1 feast of St. Justin to revisit — summer or not — how we do Sunday Eucharist and why it matters. This preaching could well continue next Sunday to emphasize even more how Eucharist is first a deed of the baptized assembly; if we are to celebrate the Sunday called the Body and Blood of Christ, we should do it reflecting on how that Sunday deed is to grow ever stronger in this assembly. As we stand at the beginning of the summer, there should be no expectation that our summer Sunday gatherings will be less beautiful, less intense.
Gabe Huck

Last Sunday we celebrated Pentecost, the fiftieth and last day of the Easter season. Last Monday the church found itself back in what is called Ordinary Time, the time when we count the Sundays one by one from now until Advent comes in December. We ease back into this long, steady time with two Sundays that have special names: Today is called Trinity Sunday and next Sunday is called The Body and Blood of Christ. Though these are not ancient feasts in the church, these two Sundays still bring wonderful scriptures and poetry and ask us to begin these six months of counted Sundays affirming how much we baptized people need our Sunday assembly all year round.

Now here’s one more name and one more day on the calendar. Last Tuesday, the first day of June, the church marked the feast of a philosopher and martyr named Justin. This Justin was born in Palestine and died in far-off Rome , just like Saint Peter a century before him. He was baptized into the Christian community at a time when the elders of the community probably still remembered knowing one or the other of the disciples who had known Jesus. After he was baptized a Christian, Justin kept in touch with his learned friends, even though they thought the followers of Jesus were some very strange fringe cult. Unlike most Christians, Justin had the formal education to carry on a dialogue with these people. In doing so, he wrote down one of the earliest descriptions we have of just what happened when the Christians came together on the first day the week.

Justin’s philosopher friends, who were not Christians, imagined these gatherings to be full of all kinds of foolishness. Justin tried to tell them exactly what went on — and because of this, nineteen centuries later we can know what happened in second-century Rome when baptized people gathered every Sunday.

What Justin wrote about this is very brief. Listen to it now and think of those times and of our times. Justin begins with two sentences summing up what Christians do:

“Those who have more come to the aid of those who lack, and we are constantly together. Over all that we receive we bless the Maker of all things through his Son Jesus Christ and through the Holy Spirit.”

Then Justin describes the Lord’s Day gathering:

On the day called Sunday there is a meeting in one place of those who live in cities or the country, and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read as long as time permits. Then we all stand up together and offer prayers.


When we have finished the prayer, bread is brought, and wine and water, and the president similarly sends up prayers and thanksgivings to the best of his ability, and the congregation assents, saying the Amen.


The distribution of the consecrated elements and reception by each one takes place and [these elements] are sent to the absent by the deacons.


Those who prosper, and who so wish, contribute, each one as much as each chooses to. What is collected is deposited with the president, and he takes care of orphans and widows, and those who are in want on account of sickness or any other cause, and those who are in prison, and the strangers who are sojourners among us; in short, he is the protector of all those in need.


We all hold this common gathering on Sunday, since it is the first day, on which God, transforming darkness and matter, made the universe, and Jesus Christ our Savior rose from the dead on the same day.


We hear in Justin’s description much that makes us feel in a beautiful continuity with our ancestors in faith. It is Sunday when we gather, then and now. We come together in one place, then and now. Then and now we read and listen to scripture, what in Justin’s day was called the “memoirs of the apostles” and “the writings of the prophets.” Then and now, when this is finished, we all stand up together and offer prayers. What is happening here? This public reading of what we call scripture is the foundation on which we build our lives, as individuals but even more as a local church. The hearing and the pondering and the active reflecting on those scriptures — by all of us — is sustenance for us. With the scriptures still echoing in our ears, we pour out our prayers. This is no mumbled “let us pray to the Lord”; it is a vital part of what baptized people are charged to do. We are to stay aware of the hurt and trouble of the whole world, the hurt and trouble of the church, and we are to raise all this noisily to God in prayer.

Then and now, when these prayers for the world and the church are finished, bread and wine are brought. In Justin’s time the prayer to be prayed over those gifts, praising God, thanking God, was not written down. The presider, or “president” as Justin says, would speak the prayer by heart, improvising along well-established lines. But much in that prayer would sound so familiar to us today: praising God with the angels, calling the Holy Spirit to come upon the assembly and the gifts of bread and wine, remembering all the wonders God has done, and especially God’s love outpoured in Jesus, through whom we give to God all thanks, all praise, all glory.

Then and now the words of the presider are affirmed and confirmed, approved and acclaimed by all present in the word we still use: Amen! Amen is what we send out strongly and fully to seal all that has been prayed around the table and our bread and wine. Amen was the word in Justin’s day, and Amen it is today. And that prayer and that Amen are for Justin no magic mumbling but they are those few moments of each week, each life, that make clear what every bit of baptized life is about. “Over all that we receive,” Justin says, “we bless the Maker of all things through his Son Jesus Christ and through the Holy Spirit.” And there is our Trinity we name today. We bless the Maker through Jesus and the Spirit. That describes not only the eucharistic prayer but what we try to do with our lives.

Then and now, the bread and wine over which all present have prayed are distributed to everyone and are later taken to the sick. That’s all Justin says but what more is needed to describe our communion rite? Today we pray the Lord’s Prayer and exchange the peace. They probably did something like that also. Justin doesn’t say that the bread was broken, but it had to be; two generations before Justin the whole gathering on Sunday was being called “the breaking of the bread.” What Justin does say is that each one shares in the bread and the wine, consecrated now by the prayer and its Amen. Each one shares. Each one takes a bit of bread, a sip of wine. Then and now this meager banquet, as Paul will tell us next Sunday, is how we proclaim the death of the Lord until Christ comes. We hunger and we thirst for this morsel of bread and taste of wine, become for us the Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ.

What should all this Sunday work of ours be doing? Justin modestly explains that it should be changing things, the effort of a few nonconformists to make a new kind of world. At the Sunday gathering this is manifest in ongoing efforts to redistribute the wealth. All contribute what they can, and Justin claims that the church sees to it that this is used to care for orphans and widows, the poor, the sick, prisoners, and those who are parted from their homes. But Justin uses the word “protector” rather than “provider.” The church is to protect all of these people. What else should we expect? In Justin’s report, what we hear about our ancestors in the faith is the bond between what they were doing with their lives and what they were doing together on Sundays.

We have some things to learn from our ancestors, pioneers in this faith. Have we this morning listened well to the scriptures? Do we wonder a bit at that Proverbs poem about someone called Wisdom who was helping God create, who was God’s delight, and who played like a child on the earth, loving to be with the human race? Do we let poetry like that tell us about the Holy Trinity? And in a few moments what sort of intense attention to the world’s troubles will we bring to the prayer of the faithful? When we are summoned to lift up our hearts, how will the praise and thanksgiving reflect the way we live day by day, the way we decide what matters in this world? How hungry are we, individually and even more as a church, for the holy communion?

So we begin these weeks and months that are not part of any named season, but every one of these Sundays is for us to assemble and do our work. That is what Justin did until they came and arrested him for it and cut off his head. He was asking for it. So are we.
Copyright © Gabe Huck. Used by permission.

Originally written for Celebration, the worship and preaching resource of the National Catholic Reporter (visit their Web site at www.celebrationpublications.org)
Back to top
Saints Peter and Paul, Apostles

The following is an example of how catechesis from and for the liturgy may be done in the Sunday homily. This is written as a homily for the feast of Saints Peter and Paul, June 29, which comes on a Sunday in 2003. It attempts an unfolding of the prayers of intercession.
Gabe Huck

Peter and Paul, an odd couple if ever there was one. Peter, the rough and sometimes bumbling fisherman. Paul, the scholar and writer and tireless traveler. They might have led quiet lives along the eastern shores of the Mediterranean. Instead they believed the gospel and ended up in the heart of the empire, Rome, calling themselves apostles of the Lord Jesus.

As their stories are told in the book of Acts, Peter and Paul were no strangers to prisons. The charge against them was often what we today call “disturbing the peace.” One time in Macedonia, in the city of Philippi, Paul and his companion, Silas, were arrested, beaten, put in prison and shackled on the charge of “disturbing our city.” Maybe you have heard the spiritual that begins: “Paul and Silas bound in jail / got nobody for to go their bail. / Keep your eyes on the prize, hold on, hold on.” And hold on they did. Here’s what Acts says happened next: “About midnight , . . . Paul and Silas were praying and singing hymns to God as the prisoners listened” (Acts 16:25). Suddenly an earthquake opened all the doors and ripped the chains from the walls.

Today we read about a time when Peter was thrown into prison and double-chained to the wall; a soldier slept on his right, another on his left, and there were more guards outside. But elsewhere in town, we are told, “prayer by the church was fervently being made to God on his behalf” (Acts 12:5). No earthquake this time, but an angel brings Peter out of prison and back to the praying church.

The chains fall, the doors open — when? When Paul and Silas are praying and singing. When Peter is sound asleep, in what might have been his last night alive, but his Christian community, across town, is wide awake and praying fervently for his deliverance. What we see at work here isn’t some extraordinary event in the early church’s life. That is, maybe the earthquake was extraordinary, and maybe the escape-assisting angel was extraordinary, but what wasn’t extraordinary at all was this: There was loud prayer going on.

So from the beginning, prayers silent and aloud, prayers spoken and sung, prayers alone and prayers in common, were being woven into the daily and nightly life of baptized people. They had heard all those stories of Jesus praying, and they had the psalms from the Hebrew Bible that seem to have been part of the vocabulary of Christians from the very start. Deep in our church’s way of living the gospel of Jesus is this habit of whispering or chanting or crying out to God about all that is amiss, all that is wrong, all that is painful and unjust and desperate.

How do we learn to do this? Sometimes we begin to learn this way of praying, this way of lifting up to God all the sick and the dying, the lonely and the poor, from our parents. We kneel down by our bed at night and we pray for everybody. We say, “God bless Grandma and Grandpa and Uncle Ed.” God bless this one and that one. These are not simply children’s prayers, they are the church taking its responsibility to bring all the world’s needs before the Lord. Sometimes we learn at the household table, at the prayer before or after the evening meal, when we speak out the prayers we have.

And when we assemble on the Lord’s Day we do this all together. First, we read from the scriptures, we sing psalms and alleluias, we share a homily and creed. But then, before we come to the table with bread and wine, we make the prayer of the faithful, the intercessions. This is how we learn week by week how to pray. This assembly, all of us, having kept our ears open to the scriptures and preaching, having opened our mouths to sing songs and psalms, we now have the need and the words to do what baptized people are charged to do. We gather into our hearts and words the world’s sadness and troubles, all that is breaking apart, all the grief and need and terror. Who else will do this?

We are not here to look out for ourselves but to clamor before God for those who are powerless, silenced, abused, worked to death, scared to death, hopeless, mad. We have our lists of the sick and the dying, the dead and the mourning, but also our lists of the imprisoned and unemployed, the developmentally disabled and the morally disabled.

We are here to clamor also for those who have great power in state or church or science or corporation or media. We clamor to God not with some mild neutrality. We clamor that they be granted enough compassion to quit hurting others. We clamor that they stumble on enough wisdom to work for the common good. We clamor that the goods of the earth be shared and shared alike, that the wealth we are pouring into nuclear and chemical swords be put instead into the work of educating and healing all over the world. We clamor for the earth itself, its beauty and sustaining goodness quickly being lost because we cannot restrain our greed.

The society presumes we’ll look out for number one, help the poor a bit when we can without too much inconvenience to ourselves, keep our noses to some grindstone, and leave the running of the world to those who manage the nations, the corporations, and the armies. Isn’t it so? Occasionally we’ll be offered some sad case — an abused child, a society murder, a bought politician — and we’ll follow along like a soap opera, thinking we are seeing reality.

But in the intercessions we are training our eyes to work in an entirely different way. The eyes of the baptized are open eyes. Every day. The open eyes of the baptized are fixed where the gospel would have us look. And what we see prompts us to cry out to the Lord, even those of us who are so privileged by the current system of distribution. We look at the world with eyes open and our gaze is gospel-directed, and so we come face to face with the immensity of need and pain and waste. The gospel makes us do this and not despair. The gospel makes us do this, and instead of despair it tells us to cry out, to intercede, to make a loud clamor before the Lord.

For us, it is as if we are here to do this shouting, to wake up the Lord. “Arise, Lord, why are you sleeping?” says one of the psalms. That’s us, making bold as Peter would do, as the passionate preaching Paul might do. That’s our line in this drama: Arise, Lord, why are you sleeping? Those in fact are the prayers we make just before we approach the altar with bread and wine, those prayers that have us responding with “Lord, hear our prayer,” or “Lord, have mercy,” or the like. If they seem to fall dead from our lips, then we are failing to do one of the basic charges of our baptism. We have let the world go. We have abandoned the great world and all its sadness when indeed we were baptized to love it and to shout out to God, to wake God up, to clamor on until God takes notice of the sick, the poor, the oppressed, the prisoners, the dying, the earth itself.

These prayers of intercession are a litany-like flow when we name what we have seen all around us, in the parish, the town, the city, the whole world. We name it. We don’t tell God how to fix it, we don’t parade our own precious solutions. We just name it and in naming it we renew our gospel seeing, our commission to keep our eyes fixed where healing and justice and peace and sharing and care and restraint are lacking and so needed. Praying together these intercessions on Sunday, we are rehearsing not simply the bedside or tableside prayers of the week to come, but we are rehearsing how to spend our time and energy through the days. We do this interceding, this rehearsing, as a church, all of us caught up in one prayer, the body of Christ at prayer. There’s no way to do it alone, no way to wake God, no way to get Got to remember what is needed here except we do it together, the church, the body of Christ. For it is Christ who intercedes with our voice and we with the voice of Christ.

So we stand attentively during these prayers of intercession, and we give our attention to them, and those responsible try hard to shape the words, and when we can, we raise them up into chant and song so that we are caught up into the rhythm of the litany that is the church clamoring before God, getting God’s attention. In us the whole world is here to cry out just as the church was crying out for imprisoned Peter, and Paul and Silas were crying out. The prison walls won’t hold against such prayer.
Copyright © Gabe Huck. Used by permission.
Originally written for Celebration, the worship and preaching resource of the National Catholic Reporter (visit their Web site at www.celebrationpublications.org)
Back to top
Dedication of the Lateran Basilica in Rome

What follows is a homily for Sunday, November 9, 2003. In the Roman Catholic calendar, the Thirty-second Sunday in Ordinary Time is replaced by the feast of the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica in Rome. This attempt at a mystagogical reflection, then, centers on the house of the church.
Gabe Huck

Last Sunday and today, when we should be in the home stretch of our year-long reading of the gospel of Mark, we have been diverted. It happens that in 2003 both November 2, which is All Souls Day, and today, November 9, fall on Sundays. All Souls Day, like All Saints Day on November 1, is the time when the gathered church prays and sings about the communion of saints, the bond we have with all who have gone before us. The scripture readings and the songs of those first two days of November bring us before the mystery of death. All through November we are conscious that, as the song says, “we are walking in the footsteps of those who’ve gone before.” And so we, the church, attend with care to the burial of the dead, and we proclaim each November as we do each Sunday of the year that in Jesus death is defeated, and we strive each year to thwart the unjust ways of death in this unjust world.

But today, November 9, why today are we not doing the readings and the songs of this third-to-last Sunday of Ordinary Time in 2003? The answer is very strange, very political, very human. Today is an anniversary that none of us would ever remember because the event happened more than 1,700 years ago. How many of us here know the anniversary date and the year of dedication of this building? But the Roman church, perhaps wishing to tug a little on those bonds that make us Catholic, wants the whole Catholic tribe to keep the anniversary of the cathedral in Rome. And the cathedral in Rome is not Saint Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican. It is the Church of Saint John Lateran. It is the oldest of the four basilicas in Rome and stands on the site of an ancient palace belonging to the Laterani family. It was dedicated by Pope Sylvester I in the year 324, and ever since then has been the cathedral of Rome, therefore the cathedral of the bishop of Rome (now usually called the pope).

Now we should be aware that there were Christians before there were special buildings where they met for Eucharist and prayer. The followers of Jesus continued to pray in the temple in Jerusalem and continued to attend synagogues outside Jerusalem, and they gathered in one another’s homes for the breaking of bread on the Lord’s Day. Getting land and building a big hall wasn’t a priority. Owning property and buildings was from the start a two-edged sword. One edge was how their buildings could be places of artistry in wood and stone and glass; they could be houses for the church, places of peace and sanctuary and strength. But there has always been that other edge: we quarrel about our buildings, about the shape and the furniture and the art. And we get entangled in maintaining our own properties instead of caring for the world, serving ourselves instead of serving the world.

By the fifth century it was clear that Christians were going to have their buildings. It had a lot to do with other changes in relationships among the baptized, early egalitarian models giving way to hierarchies learned from the Roman civil government. Adaptation is necessary, imitation is often dangerous. But what happened, happened, and so all these hundreds of years later, here we are, a church gathered on November 9 and thinking about this place, the building where we meet.

Here — this floor, this roof above us, these walls and windows — here is a place that is a house for the church, our house. In our house some vital transactions take place. Here we confess our sins and praise the goodness of God. Here we gather around couples ready to commit themselves to each other. Here we keep the oils for anointing the sick and the catechumens and the newly baptized. Here we bring the bodies of those who have died so that we can together commend our dead to the love of God. And here, Easter by Easter, the catechumens are baptized and confirmed and taken to the holy table. Here, Sunday by Sunday we come together and together give attention to God’s word, together pray for every needy one in the world, together give thanks to God over bread and wine and share alike in the holy communion. All these deeds done publicly, and many devotions done privately, will, little by little, make this place dear to us. But this is far more than tender sentiment. It is strength to do our work, strength to do Eucharist and baptism, hard deeds in this world.

That’s not new. Near the baptizing place in that old Roman cathedral of Saint John, we would find, still today, a Latin inscription that was carved when they began using this pool for baptisms. The scholar Aidan Kavanagh has given the text a poetic translation that begins:

Here is born in Spirit-soaked fertility
a brood destined for another City,
begotten by God’s blowing
and borne upon this torrent
by the Church their virgin mother.


What is this “spirit-soaked fertility”? And who is this “brood destined for another City”? Perhaps we have experienced this ourselves at the great Vigil between Holy Saturday and Easter Sunday when, after long hours in reading and reflection, we approach our font to baptize those who have come to us through the catechumenate. Spirit-soaked fertility indeed! What birth happens at our font? From what lovemaking come these newborn, whether infants or adults? Who is this virgin and mother Church? Look around, you will see. And those who are born here, and that is all of us from one baptism pool or another, we are the “brood destined for another City,” a city not made by hand but somehow a city we are helping to fashion day by gracious day in this earthly city.

The inscription on the wall of the baptistery in Rome ’s old cathedral continues:

This spring is life that floods the world,
the wounds of Christ its awesome source.
Sinner, here scour sin away down to innocence,
for they know no enmity who are by
one font, one Spirit, one faith, made one.
Sinner, shudder not at sin’s kind and number,
for those born here are holy.


Jesus was baptized by John in the Jordan. In the New Testament we read of other baptisms in other rivers. For some Christians, the nearest river is still the best place for baptism. There’s something about flowing water! We heard Ezekiel today: “Water [was] flowing out from beneath the threshold of the temple . . . Wherever the river flows, every sort of living creature that can multiply shall live” (Ezekiel 47:1, 9). Everything will live where the river goes! When Christians moved indoors, they brought the river with them. Somewhere in our gathering place we have water to baptize, water to sign us in remembrance of baptism. This is the river the poet sees as flowing from the side of Christ, “the wounds of Christ its awesome source.” In our indoor churches we had centuries when the river nearly dried up, barely a trickle by a dry font. Christians then could easily forget that they were born in these waters, and that in these waters where we come as sinners our sin is scoured “down to innocence.” But of late we give more attention to the river, the font that is the river for us, and we can tell ourselves that here in this watery womb, here in this watery tomb, is both death and life, life born out of death. Perhaps the terror of baptism is too much for us, and we busy ourselves with camera angles and social niceties, missing the death, missing the birth. How can this house of ours compel our attention to the waters that both drown and bring life?

Besides the font with its water, the only other essential furnishing of this house of the church is the table. Churches don’t need pews, benches, or chairs. These were late additions in our history, coming when the assembled people had become little more than an audience watching the doings of the ordained. Churches don’t need candlesticks. They don’t need stations or stained glass or pamphlet racks. They don’t need the pulpit or ambo because the book of the scriptures can be held by the reader and proclaimed to the assembly. But our room does need the table with its bread and its wine.

Again, history shows us how the household breaking bread and sharing a common cup on the Lord’s Day evolved into silent congregations watching as the table was placed against the wall, the words were whispered in a strange language, no one shared the cup and few shared the bread of life. But in these generations right now we come to know again the table, a human-sized furnishing that we can surround, a center to our assembly, a well-made table that calls us to gather around in great reverence for the deeds to be done here. As we gather, the presider approaches this table and greets it with a deep bow and with a kiss, a kiss given on behalf of all the assembly for the table itself has been for us a presence of the Lord Jesus. So that intimate human deed, the kiss, becomes our greeting of this table and also our farewell when we take our leave.

If we would know better who we are, we Christians, begin here at the table — before it is prepared even, before it holds the bread and wine that will, with thanksgiving, become for us the body and blood of Christ. Begin at the table and ask: What sort of people, what kind of tribe, what “brood,” would place in its midst a simple table? Do you wish to know who we are? Well, look at this — we tell each other and we tell the world who we are with nothing more than a table and ourselves gathered there, attentive, needy, and ever proclaiming the praise of God and giving God thanks before coming forward to dine at this table from bread broken for us and a cup poured out for us. And in our tradition, this room needs also a place where the holy bread is kept as food for the dying, as food for those who are sick and cannot be in the assembly on Sunday.

So the font with water, the table with bread and wine. What else is the feast of the dedication of Rome’s cathedral about? We heard it in the gospel: “[Jesus] was speaking about the temple of his body” (John 2:21). The inscription at the baptistery calls us by one of our names, sinners. Sinners, the body of Christ. Yes, both are what we are, and we — the sinners, the body of Christ — are what this room needs. We are the church, not this room or that big room in Rome. The room in Rome is a house for the church. So is this, a dear house indeed, but we who come here to do Eucharist, to baptize, to pray, to anoint, to confess, to marry, to bid farewell, to bless — we are Christ’s body, the church.
Copyright © Gabe Huck. Used by permission.

Originally written for Celebration, the worship and preaching resource of the National Catholic Reporter (visit their Web site at www.celebrationpublications.org).
Back to top
These homilies may be copied and adapted for your own use;
however, they may not be commercially published without permission of the author.
Home    |    Calendar/Calendario    |    Translator/Traductor    |    Readings/Lecturas    |    Links/Enlaces

e-mail: mail@homilies.net
  homilies.net is a non-profit contribution to the work of the Church  
©1999 - 2008 homilies.net